What is explanandum in philosophy?

Definition of explanandum : a word or an expression whose meaning is to be explained —used chiefly in philosophy —contrasted with explanans.

What is explanandum in logic?

explanandum – (logic) a statement of something (a fact or thing or expression) to be explained.

What is the difference between explanandum and explanans?

An explanandum (a Latin term) is a sentence describing a phenomenon that is to be explained, and the explanans are the sentences adduced as explanations of that phenomenon.

What is the meaning of explanans?

Definition of explanans : the meaning of a word or an expression —used chiefly in philosophy —contrasted with explanandum.

Is Hempel a model?

The deductive-nomological model (DN model) of scientific explanation, also known as Hempel’s model, the Hempel–Oppenheim model, the Popper–Hempel model, or the covering law model, is a formal view of scientifically answering questions asking, “Why…?”.

What makes an explanation good?

A good explanation is a description and justification of a process used to solve a mathematical exercise or problem that includes… An appeal to images that relate how the methods are actually modifying the quantities; • Goal statements that explain the purposes of the methods. • An unbroken chain of causal relations.

What is deductive Nomological?

Deductive-Nomological Explanation The deductive-nomological model used to be the standard conception of explanation: one explains a phenomenon by deducing the description of the phenomenon from a law and a description of the particular circumstances in which the phenomenon in question occurs.

Is Hempel a positivist?

One of the leading members of logical positivism, he was born in Oranienburg, Germany, in 1905. He studied physics with Max Planck and logic with von Neumann. In 1929, Hempel took part in the first congress on scientific philosophy organized by logical positivists.

Do good explanations have to be true?

With regard to the Natural Sciences and the Arts, good explanations do not have to reflect the truth. However, good explanations in both subjective and objective contexts must be true, for the extent to which something is true is based on belief while the extent of truthfulness is founded on reason.